Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine name the Nissan GT-R “Car of the Year” – But does it deserve the title?


It was an unremarkable but pleasant day this past weekend. I have sumptuously managed to wake up at 1:29 in the afternoon, a feat exceeded only by the previous day’s record of 1:40 P.M. After developing an exceedingly unhealthy outlook on life due to screaming an inordinate amount of abuse at my ancient, mentally diseased Windows ME Edition computer, I got the mail.

Sifting through the usual crap, my spirits are lifted by a little red envelope, courtesy of Netflix. I lifted something away and am pleasantly surprised to see that my Motor Trend has arrived.

Allow me to distill the next few nanoseconds of information processing: I first notice the cool futuristic green background of the magazine, I then identify the hideous Nissan GT-R on the cover, then my eyes flick up to: “CAR OF THE YEAR”. My eyes flick back down. They flick up to the top, to reaffirm that this is indeed Motor Trend. They then repeat their first two flicks.

“NOOOOOO! STUPID MOTHER F%$@#ER!”, I scream and hurl my magazine at the far wall, the sheer velocity ripping it to shreds. What I really do is just stare. And sigh.

If my previous sentences have not yet enlightened you to the fact that I dislike the Nissan GT-R, then here it is: I dislike the Nissan GT-R.


The main reason is because it is ugly. “Nissan has built the world’s ugliest, oversized electric shaver” states a MT editor, and I concur. But that would be like saying I don’t like the Toyota Camry, or the Chrysler Sebring. “Not liking” is not synonymous with “dislike”.

The other is that for some reason, I am inherently predisposed to dislike anything that everyone else adores. Example: when people herald BMW’s 3 Series, I champion Cadillac’s CTS. I also have strong feelings about “herd animals” (the kind of person who will mindlessly park next to you in an empty parking lot). I especially hate those fanatic brand-whores, the ones that flock to whatever has their specific badge, just because it bears that badge.

That sort of thing.

Most GT-R maniacs I’ve met are those cultists who know pretty much zip about the car. They don’t know the performance, the price, or any of the statistics. In a way they remind me of the BMW worshippers – even put the badge on a Pontiac Aztek and the faithful will come.

So I sit down and try to determine exactly why the GT-R wins (it was also Automobile Magazine’s Automobile of the Year). Can it be that my admittedly stubborn disposition is contaminating the realm of rational thought? Can the biased media be unbiased in their choice? Can the common cow or sheep have been right all along about automotive excellence? Well let’s find out. To the disliker of the GT-R, you may wish to re-evaluate the intensity of your feelings due to the following facts. Or not. To the crazed GT-R devotee who dreams perverted dreams of a GT-R , the following will only serve to reaffirm your sniveling love (and may even enlighten you to the facts).

First off, I must give props to Nissan for creating one of the few Japanese cars that look like they deserve to be sold. I certainly don’t think the GT-R is pretty, but Nissan’s Hiroshi Hasegawa, the chief product designer, deserves a stupendous and standing round o’ applause for shattering the mold and producing a controversially designed car (for whenever there is controversy, it means that said design is interesting enough to merit it). In an age of public opinion when “car” + “Japanese” invariably equates to “Prius”, having a sports car that looks the part certainly is refreshing.


Kazutoshi Mizuno, the chief vehicle engineer and chief product specialist of the GT-R, also deserves a standing ovation for bringing this car into being. The GT-R is his baby, for it is Japanese automotive custom to endow the chief vehicle engineer complete control over said vehicle. Most heavily involved with performance and dynamics, my man Mizuno has done made a Nissan supercar (sorta kinda not really) that has turned the performance car world upside down. Way to go.

Now to the main part, the part that has those knowledgeable cult fans screaming their damnfool heads off, and more sensible car journalists look happily bewildered the performance. I’ll throw some facts out first: 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds, top speed of 193 mph. Sound good? Now check these out: a V-6 engine, 480 horsepower, 430 pound-feet of torque, 3891 pounds curb weight, EPA estimated 16/21 mpg, $77,840 base price, seating for four. Viewed separately, the first and seconds groups of data associate well. It’s when you mix them together that all hell breaks loose.

For instance, how do supercar statistics mix with large luxury sedan or SUV attributes? How does the GT-R hit 193 mph with only a V-6 engine? For that matter, how does a car weighing more than a Saturn Vue, with the help of less horsepower and torque than a Shelby GT500, outgun to 60 mph a Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4, and all for cheaper than a BMW M5? How, indeed.

In an interview with Popular Mechanics, Nissan’s design boss, Shiro Nakamura, stated that “The element of functionality is core to the GT-R.\” Meaning the design ethos for the GT-R was function over form, which explains its sad deficiency in the “looks” department. However, the car is astonishingly aerodynamic, and its computer formulated shape has a low 0.27 drag coefficient. For those unfamiliar with this measurement (it’s not a horse, pound-foot, time, or speed, the horror) the lower the better. For context, a new Scion xB achieves a 0.32, and a Corvette Z06 gets a 0.28. A much ballyhooed aspect of the GT-R is a kink along the spine of the C-pillar. It’s said to enhance aerodynamics. The front fender louvers are functional, improve airflow, and help cool the demonic, household appliance sounding twin turbo engine.

The body itself is composed of a variety of metals. Fancy forms of steel make up most of what you see, while more steel, aluminum, and carbon fiber are meshed together for stuff like the suspension braces, engine bay, and door insides. The underbody boasts polypropylene, glass-fiber, and more carbon.


The engine is hand built by a single technician in a climate controlled room. The cylinders are plasma coated, and twin IHI turbochargers round out the deal.

Let me now pause and make a confession: I have no idea what I’m talking about. That doesn’t mean the above information is wrong, it is simply too technical for me to understand. I only include it because I sense that it is relevant to the GT-R’s secret. If, like me, you could barely fathom high school chemistry, then feel free to skip the jargon. There will be straightforward car-writing after the technical barrage.

Perhaps the most important part of the GT-R is the transmission. Part of the reason why the GT-R possesses such speedy 0-60 scoots is due to its super short gearing. The advantage of this is that shorter gearing gives the engine more power, or “leverage” over the wheels. The downside is that the transmission must go through more shifts. For example, a Corvette Z06 can hit 60 mph just in first gear; the GT-R reaches the same speed only after two time consuming shifts. To make up for this, Nissan employs the trick of uninterrupted torque during shifts. From what I understand, in a normal car, during the time between clicking the paddle and accelerating in the next gear, the clutch disengages before the next gear shifts in. With the GT-R, power continues to flow, giving a “boost” when the next gear does shift in.

The GT-R features an advanced ATTESA E-TS system. It’s an all wheel drive system that differs from standard kinds in that it can control the amount of torque distributed to each wheel. And though the GT-R is a rear-drive vehicle, up to 50 percent of the torque can be delivered to the front wheels. The ATTESA E-TS system constantly takes measurements and makes decisions based on sensors that measure almost everything, and continuously adjusts the torque flow.


And finally, the GT-R is the world’s first production car to feature “Independent Transaxle 4WD”. Which is basically a rear-mounted transaxle with two independent propeller shafts. Boil those words down and you get “each axle can control tire grip without manipulation from the other”.

Handling-wise, suffice it to say that the GT-R is a beast. Mostly. Predominant flaws include a piggish understeer that can suddenly change into a snapping oversteer if you upset the car around the track, bad ride quality, and the video-game persona of the car. Top speed is 193 mph, but the suspension makes this trip a terribly frightening ride (the “Comfort” setting is an astonishingly boldfaced lie). Even at normal speeds, the GT-R suffers from a below average ride, due to its ultra-stiff suspension.

The remarkably detached, video-game personality of the GT-R has drawn much criticism. That is, when you turn the wheel, the car turns, if you step on the brake, the car stops, and if you step on the other pedal, the car moves. There is no emotion to the car, and driving it is like playing a futuristic Gran Turismo game. Laments a MT tester, “If someone buys a car for more than just pure performance, i.e., emotional feel, the GT-R would be at a disadvantage”.

The interior of this car has received mixed reviews. Some say it looks too cheap and straightforward, the opposition responding with: it’s only 78 K. A Chevy Malibu has a nicer interior comes the response, the GT-R is a pure performance machine and is thus exempt from nice interiors chirps up the opposition, then why do you bitch about the Corvette? comes the riposte.



Whatever. What you like is what you will prefer. While unemotional, the interior gets the job done well enough. A highlight is the Play Station-esque screen that provides fairly useless but hugely entertaining data.

Overall, however, it is what the Nissan GT-R can do that astonishes. Forget the “in spite of” and the “for the money”. Outracing to 60 mph such beasts as a Porsche 911 Turbo, the Gallardo LP560-4, and the Mercedes SLR McLaren is impressive no matter what the vehicle is. Factor in all that should hinder it- nearly two tons, a V-6 engine, measly power and torque numbers, and all for less than 80 K. Getting 21 mpg highway is respectable (cough cough) as well, while four seats even make it somewhat practical. Mix everything together and the winner is clear. The GT-R is beastly (if somewhat emotionless), shocking, controversial, and in this year’s test of brand new cars, unbeatable. “You don’t have to like it”, writes Automobile Magazine, “You just have to stay the hell out of its way.”

I don’t like the Nissan GT-R. In fact, I wouldn’t be caught dead in one. Even after writing this article, my feelings remain the same. Nevertheless, the GT-R has been chosen twice as this year’s best car because it deserves to be. It has seemingly defied the laws of physics, broke with convention, and most importantly: shattered the current performance car status quo. I don’t like the car, but I acknowledge its merit. Good choice Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine. Congratulations Nissan, and congratulations to the GT-R.


Side note: One thing I do love about the GT-R is the juicy target it presents. Chevy has already riposted with the psychotic ZR1. Dodge has their Viper ACR. Now how long do you think Porsche is gonna sit back and allow the GT-R to smear its name?

Source: Motor Trend, Automobile Magazine, and Popular Mechanics

Categories:: Car NewsCar OpinionsNissan

Comments (12)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Bill says:

    I'm so sick of these so-called auto experts dumping on the GT-R. They bandy about the words "soul" and "emotion" like they are metaphysical experts.

    Just what is "soul"? and "emotion" in a car? I doubt they can answer that. They are like so many lemmings joining the bandwagon of negativity about a fantastic automobile.

    I'd like to know if this fool has driven one. If he has and gets no emotional thrill, then he is a zombie.

    Oh, but then he goes on to say, even though the car is no good, it deserves car of the year award. What a jerk!

    We don't need any backhanded compliments from these journalistic fools.

    They should go back to writing about the soul-laden and highly emotional cars like the Prius or Ford Flex.

    Excuse me, I have to go throw up now.

  2. Kris says:

    +1. This guy gets so many points wrong that it's just silly. The GTR is definitely not the coolest thing on the planet, but it's a damn sight better than most cars.

    If you're going to write an automotive blog, try coming up with some new ideas rather than just regurgitating facts and statistics with an overly generous seeding of last years' conversational fodder.

    Articles like these just reek of jealous envy. People can either appreciate the car for the technical engineering and cost-consciousness of it, or they can despise it for doing most things exceptionally well.

  3. Chris says:

    You're missing the point Bill. Fortunately, I know your type, and understand the way you think. You see the graphs in Motor Trend and Automobile magazine after their test drive and drool over the numbers: 0-20, 0-30, 0-60, 5-60, 40-60, 100-0, slalom speed, lateral Gs, front/rear weight distribution, etc. Then you make your decision on whether you like the car based on those numbers. 95% of the readership of those magazines do the same, so you're not the only one.

    The problem here is that if you like those numbers in the magazine, then you go bash anyone who doesn't like that car.

    If you don't understand what soul and emotion is in a car as you stated, then I wouldn't understand you to get what Will is trying to say here. The Nissan GT-R is a finely tuned car, capable of much more than it should be capable of. That doesn't mean it's a pleasure to drive, it just means that it's fast.

    When we drove the Mercedes McLaren SLR last month, it had the same problem. It was incredibly fast, but didn't have any soul, or personality. The slower Audi R8 was more pleasant to drive. Just because a car is fast, doesn't mean it's a good car.

    That's not to say the GT-R is a bad car, by any means. I haven't driven it, so I can't say one way or the other. Based on what I've seen, I actually like the GT-R quite a bit, but I'll make my final decision after driving it.

    Bill – have you driven the Nissan GT-R?

  4. Andy says:

    So you like the numbers and statistics of the car, but you still hate it because it's "ugly"? Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, everyone has different tastes. Then the 'soul/ personality'…. and a bad or uncomfortable ride is complmentary to performance. Everyone knows that a performance parts has stiffer springs and suspension, plus the tires are different so it can hug the road, which in turn, results in the driver or passenger being able to feel every minor bump in the road. so get things right before you bash on the car or others who like it.

  5. Bill says:

    Chris – I OWN one. And yes I have driven it, and driven it, and driven it, and driven it… and YOU haven't. So what the hell makes you an expert?

    I got one of the first GT-Rs in AZ (July 11, 2008). If you don't believe me, I'll provide the VIN number and pix of me taking delivery of the car off the truck at the dealer in Prescott, AZ

    And you damn well DON''T know "my type" – just what is "my type" according to you? All I can say is I'm glad I'm not YOUR type, e.g. the big-mouth know it all type. I'm 66 and have had plenty of experience with many, many cars in the last 50 years. How old are you? 20?

    And no, I don't understand what "soul" and "emotion" are according to YOU! I know what they are according to me, but "my type" is wrong. Please explain for me Einstein, since you know it all.

  6. Chris says:

    Bill, I never said I was an expert, so quit making assumptions. In fact, my exact words were "I haven’t driven it, so I can’t say one way or the other. Based on what I've seen, I actually like the GT-R quite a bit, but I'll make my final decision after driving it."

    You seem to have missed my point as well, and that wasn't to say that the GT-R isn't a good car – I like the car. I was simply defending Will's opinion, and the possibility that it's not all it's cracked up to be. Since you're so quick to jump to conclusions, I'll reiterate: I've never driven the car, so I don't know – I was simply defending the possibility, just as I would with any car, before driving it.

    My age is irrelevant, as is yours, although you seem rather immature for 66. I own this website, and drive a new car each week (for review,) so rest assured I have plenty of experience with cars as well, including supercars – some with "soul" and some without.

    In my experience, the difference is in how the car is made. Some supercars are made with the specific intention of making them ultra-fast. The cars with this "soul" or personality are the ones made for driving enjoyment and well as speed. When driving these cars, it's easy to tell how the car was made. That's an over-simplification, but hopefully you get the idea.

  7. kwa says:

    driven 240z,300zxTT,porche Targa, Carrera Turbo, corvette, toyota Supra TT, miata tuned, honda s2000, acura nsx, toyota mr2 turbo, bmw m3,m5 … GT-R drive like none of them, i can't believe how continuous boost/performance it has w/o any clutch/shift lags, it flows straight period. all other performance cars always need that certain RPM in order to kick no matter how much hp u have. as for looks, wide body monstrous, sharp cut blades between curves that any man can adore, (a manly Samurai), if you don't like go screw your Prius & Pontiac Aztec…… it's mind blowing enjoyment… for Porsche to make a claim that Nissan cheated, is already doing justice for the GT-R and earning it "Car of the Year 2009"! The Soul of the car is transformed with transitions from steering, gas pedal, shifts, and braking. Go ride one!

  8. Will says:


    This is what I'm talking about: die-hard GT-R fanatics like Bill, Kris, and Andy. You guys are so narrow-minded that you won't open up yourselves to new ideas, that is, that your favorite car just might not be the best thing ever made.

    Little Billy… Jesus says that the charitable thing to do when slapped is to turn the other cheek, and I was raised Christian, so instead of ripping you I'm going to make an honest effort to placate you.

    Let me make one point clear: I have not yet driven the GT-R. Therefore I must resort to the opinions given by the MT and Automobile editors. When I say the car is emotion-less, perhaps you failed to realize that I quoted MT. In fact, every honest magazine review on the GT-R makes some mention of its "video game persona". You obviously do not think so, but just what exactly makes pouting Little Billy here more knowledgeable than America's leading automotive experts?

    Andy, of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder, that's why the car biz is as interesting as it is. If you are entitled to your opinion, am I not entitled to mine? It seems, sir, that you have a basic misunderstanding of how ride quality is judged. Every manufacturer could set up their cars with super stiff springs, but then ride quality sucks. Sheer performance is easy, what's hard is finding that magic spot that gives shocking performance without destroying comfort.

    Kris… all I can say is that it looks like someone has a case of "I drive an '81 Honda with three cylinders"…

    Chris, you have my thanks for respecting and supporting an honest opinion. We do not agree on the GT-R, but I'm glad that you aren't the narrow-minded type. I knew this article would generate controversy, which is partly why I wrote it.

    Wow, that was a long response. I’m done now, hopefully you guys can understand my points.

  9. Chris says:

    You need to drive a GTR to understand.

  10. Chris says:

    Alright, so I finally drove the GT-R, and I liked it quite a lot. While all of the reports of it having no "soul" or "personality" were actually quite accurate, I didn't care while driving it. You aren't going to mistake this car for a Ferrari or Lambo, and you're not supposed to. Driving a Ferrari is something you just can't explain. The GT-R isn't like that and Nissan didn't want it to be, so people need to stop trying to compare them (Will, I'm not saying you were, but some do.) The GT-R is a mega-fast car that does everything right in a technical sense and is super-fun to drive, while providing a (relative) bargain dollar-for-performance.

  11. Mitch says:

    FACT: The GTR is exceptional
    FACT: The engineering that produced the GTR is exceptional

    The GTR wasn’t designed to be “driven to the shops and church once a week”, it was desgined to belittle everything else around it, something it does quite easily.

    The handling, the extreme power and pick up between gears, yes, between gears is nothing short of amazing.

    Yes, GTR and Skyline fans are rejoicing all over the world and who wouldn’t be, the sheer fact that it is a GTR is enough to turn anybody’s head, but one more thing that gets everybody’s attention, the power when it takes off and that’s before looking at/feeling any of the known facts and specs of this vehicle.

    An old saying does come to mind, what was it, oh,
    Never judge a book by its a cover

    If that wasn’t enough, the GT-R recently completed a lap of Norschleife, Nurburgring, in 7:29. A feat which Porsche to this day, claims as impossible.

    Bring it on I say

  12. John says:

    As a GT-R owner all I can say is "Haters gonna hate."

    Saying a car has soul and emotion is as lame as MTs "Gotta have it factor".

    It's simply a way of making excuses for lesser vehicles.

    The GT-R is a joy to drive, to steal Apple's marketing line "It just works." There's no drama, no learning curve, you just press the gas and point it where you want to go and it does the rest.

Leave a Reply

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.