<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2011 Ford Mustang Finally Gets Some Balls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-132813</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-132813</guid>
		<description>new 5.0 smashes all 12.8 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new 5.0 smashes all 12.8 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-132550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-132550</guid>
		<description>The new 5.0 does destroy everything, I was talking about the 4.6L GT </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new 5.0 does destroy everything, I was talking about the 4.6L GT </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-132541</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-132541</guid>
		<description>I dont no what you guys are reading but the new mustang gt kicks the srt and the camaro asses!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont no what you guys are reading but the new mustang gt kicks the srt and the camaro asses!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruzer</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-132360</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-132360</guid>
		<description>Not bad for the Genisis, but the Car &amp; Driver comparo has the Mustang at 5.1 in the 0-60.  While the the Genisis wound up on top because of a &quot;true sports car feel&quot;  the Mustang was on top on all three categories that mattered most. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad for the Genisis, but the Car &amp; Driver comparo has the Mustang at 5.1 in the 0-60.  While the the Genisis wound up on top because of a &quot;true sports car feel&quot;  the Mustang was on top on all three categories that mattered most. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-130518</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-130518</guid>
		<description>Very true.  You can not just look at horsepower or even torque, the only thing that really matters is cost to performance. 
 
The Current Mustang GTs performance falls in line EXACTLY with its current cost structure.  
 
The v6 mustang however when compared to the V6 Camaro, comes out lacking in the cost to performance depeartment. 
 
Adding in refinement, reputation, build quality, political considerations, financial stability, availabilty of options and durability further ups the ante in Fords across the board over chevy by leaps and bounds however. 
 
The Mustang GT also competes favorabley against cars like the 370 and the Genesis coupe when you factor in cost to performance ratios...and yes..that includes handling as it handls better than a Camaro even WITHOUT the track pack and competes &quot;so so&quot; against the 370 etc WITH the track pack. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true.  You can not just look at horsepower or even torque, the only thing that really matters is cost to performance.</p>
<p>The Current Mustang GTs performance falls in line EXACTLY with its current cost structure. </p>
<p>The v6 mustang however when compared to the V6 Camaro, comes out lacking in the cost to performance depeartment.</p>
<p>Adding in refinement, reputation, build quality, political considerations, financial stability, availabilty of options and durability further ups the ante in Fords across the board over chevy by leaps and bounds however.</p>
<p>The Mustang GT also competes favorabley against cars like the 370 and the Genesis coupe when you factor in cost to performance ratios&#8230;and yes..that includes handling as it handls better than a Camaro even WITHOUT the track pack and competes &quot;so so&quot; against the 370 etc WITH the track pack. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-130504</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-130504</guid>
		<description>what is the factory invoice on the 2011 svt mustang hardtop when is this vehicle available in 2010 please advise jesse cerda </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the factory invoice on the 2011 svt mustang hardtop when is this vehicle available in 2010 please advise jesse cerda </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burdick</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-125561</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burdick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-125561</guid>
		<description>Considering how much lighter the Mustang is, it should be faster than the Camaro.

Nissan 370Z: 4.7 seconds
Hyundai Genesis Coupe: 5.5 seconds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how much lighter the Mustang is, it should be faster than the Camaro.</p>
<p>Nissan 370Z: 4.7 seconds<br />
Hyundai Genesis Coupe: 5.5 seconds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-125558</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-125558</guid>
		<description>The current V6 does 0-60 in 6.5 seconds. The only car in its class that beats it is the Camaro which does 0-60 in 6 seconds. The 2005-2010 Mustangs all have &quot;balls&quot;. Yes this is a good improvement to the Mustang but its not like the previous generation Mustangs were dreadfully slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current V6 does 0-60 in 6.5 seconds. The only car in its class that beats it is the Camaro which does 0-60 in 6 seconds. The 2005-2010 Mustangs all have &#8220;balls&#8221;. Yes this is a good improvement to the Mustang but its not like the previous generation Mustangs were dreadfully slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-125565</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-125565</guid>
		<description>The 370Z is a lot more expensive then the V6 Mustang. I wouldn&#039;t consider it to be in the same class as the V6 Mustang. Its more of a competitor to the Gt. The Camaro boasts having 94 more hp yet only gets to 60 a half a second faster then the current Mustang... Thats pretty sad. The current V6 Stang is low on horsepower but it doesn&#039;t lack in the torque department. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 370Z is a lot more expensive then the V6 Mustang. I wouldn&#039;t consider it to be in the same class as the V6 Mustang. Its more of a competitor to the Gt. The Camaro boasts having 94 more hp yet only gets to 60 a half a second faster then the current Mustang&#8230; Thats pretty sad. The current V6 Stang is low on horsepower but it doesn&#039;t lack in the torque department. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sack</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-121662</link>
		<dc:creator>Sack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-121662</guid>
		<description>^ Who gives a **** about electric cars, ill burn 3 tanks worth for every 1 your electrics save.

Mustang still looks like garbage, though. At least now it will have a 5.0 v8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Who gives a **** about electric cars, ill burn 3 tanks worth for every 1 your electrics save.</p>
<p>Mustang still looks like garbage, though. At least now it will have a 5.0 v8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burdick</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-121663</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burdick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-121663</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s more info on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automoblog.net/2009/12/28/the-50-liter-2011-mustang-gt/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;5.0 Liter 2011 Mustang GT&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s more info on the <a href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/12/28/the-50-liter-2011-mustang-gt/" rel="nofollow">5.0 Liter 2011 Mustang GT</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rash</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-121200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-121200</guid>
		<description>Super stuff, I just wish  they are working on a hybrid Engine for the Mustang, Rolls Royce has already produced the Electric Phantom! why cant the others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super stuff, I just wish  they are working on a hybrid Engine for the Mustang, Rolls Royce has already produced the Electric Phantom! why cant the others!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rash</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-121039</link>
		<dc:creator>Rash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-121039</guid>
		<description>Lovely car , great new engine specs, thanks Ford for putting in a new engine and the amazing gearbox.. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely car , great new engine specs, thanks Ford for putting in a new engine and the amazing gearbox.. <img src='http://www.automoblog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-117093</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-117093</guid>
		<description>Hennessey also has mustangs, either 620 650 or 750 horsepower
and I&#039;ve read some articles about the z28 being back on track</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hennessey also has mustangs, either 620 650 or 750 horsepower<br />
and I&#8217;ve read some articles about the z28 being back on track</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burdick</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/comment-page-1/#comment-116922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burdick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/11/30/the-2011-ford-mustang-finally-gets-some-balls/#comment-116922</guid>
		<description>Plans for the Z28 were (sort of) canceled, but that doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t do it. In the mean time, Hennessey did the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automoblog.net/2009/06/18/hennessey-hpe550-camaro/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HPE550 Camaro&lt;/a&gt; to make up for it. They also have the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/15/2010-hennessey-hpe700-camaro/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HPE700 Camaro&lt;/a&gt;, a 705 hp variant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plans for the Z28 were (sort of) canceled, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t do it. In the mean time, Hennessey did the <a href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/06/18/hennessey-hpe550-camaro/" rel="nofollow">HPE550 Camaro</a> to make up for it. They also have the <a href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/15/2010-hennessey-hpe700-camaro/" rel="nofollow">HPE700 Camaro</a>, a 705 hp variant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

