<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Chrysler PT Cruiser Saved</title> <atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/</link> <description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: MAc</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/comment-page-1/#comment-95326</link> <dc:creator>MAc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:37:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/#comment-95326</guid> <description>I could give a F if they stopped production or not of the car as i am not planning on buying a new PT I am still whipping around these East Bay streets in the 2001 PT Cruiser me Gramma gave me A few years back... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could give a F if they stopped production or not of the car as i am not planning on buying a new PT I am still whipping around these East Bay streets in the 2001 PT Cruiser me Gramma gave me A few years back&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Borgia</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/comment-page-1/#comment-95074</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Borgia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/#comment-95074</guid> <description>&quot;The original choice to blade the PT Cruiser came when the company was trying to explain to Uncle Sam why it should go down like Paris Hilton late last year.&quot; Brilliant writing Tony! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The original choice to blade the PT Cruiser came when the company was trying to explain to Uncle Sam why it should go down like Paris Hilton late last year.&quot;</p><p>Brilliant writing Tony!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/comment-page-1/#comment-95065</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/#comment-95065</guid> <description>PT Loser. Nuff said. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PT Loser. Nuff said.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom Williams</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/comment-page-1/#comment-94947</link> <dc:creator>Tom Williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:12:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/#comment-94947</guid> <description>Thanks for spreading my word. The bottom line of the post is the PT continues...for now. And yes, it still does sell, but at a fraction of its sales when it first came out. Remember when dealers added their own premium to the MSRP? Waiting lists? Apart from a very mild refresh in 2006, the Turbo and convertible, Chrysler has largely left the PT alone-and that makes it hard to keep buyer and media interest high. That&#039;s why I want to see if Fiat can offer some new ideas to keep the PT fresh, and address your concerns (build quality, less than stellar interior materials). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for spreading my word. The bottom line of the post is the PT continues&#8230;for now. And yes, it still does sell, but at a fraction of its sales when it first came out. Remember when dealers added their own premium to the MSRP? Waiting lists? Apart from a very mild refresh in 2006, the Turbo and convertible, Chrysler has largely left the PT alone-and that makes it hard to keep buyer and media interest high. That&#039;s why I want to see if Fiat can offer some new ideas to keep the PT fresh, and address your concerns (build quality, less than stellar interior materials).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Burdick</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/comment-page-1/#comment-94889</link> <dc:creator>Chris Burdick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/08/10/chrysler-pt-cruiser-saved/#comment-94889</guid> <description>NOOOOO! I despise the PT Cruiser. I was so happy when it was going to die. Damn. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOOOOO! I despise the PT Cruiser. I was so happy when it was going to die. Damn.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 435/439 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.automoblog.net

Served from: www.automoblog.net @ 2012-02-13 07:23:21 -->
