<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Kia Soul Plus Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burdick</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/comment-page-1/#comment-133860</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burdick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/#comment-133860</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, how&#039;s the Soul treating your niece after a few more months? 
 
I&#039;ve noticed that while less powerful vehicles have the potential to deliver better fuel economy, many drivers, including myself, don&#039;t realize those gains. Reason is, we tend to drive at a reasonable pace. While a 3.0L V6, for example, takes no effort to go from a stop to 45 mph at a decent acceleration, a little four-banger like in the Soul really struggles. Hence, less efficiency. 
 
I personally don&#039;t see any benefit in owning a low-powered four-cylinder, at least with my driving habits. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, how&#039;s the Soul treating your niece after a few more months?</p>
<p>I&#039;ve noticed that while less powerful vehicles have the potential to deliver better fuel economy, many drivers, including myself, don&#039;t realize those gains. Reason is, we tend to drive at a reasonable pace. While a 3.0L V6, for example, takes no effort to go from a stop to 45 mph at a decent acceleration, a little four-banger like in the Soul really struggles. Hence, less efficiency.</p>
<p>I personally don&#039;t see any benefit in owning a low-powered four-cylinder, at least with my driving habits. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/comment-page-1/#comment-131119</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/07/30/2010-kia-soul-plus-review/#comment-131119</guid>
		<description>Hi:

My niece has had one of these for six months and quite likes it. Has the 2 litre and automatic.

However, she is only getting about 23 mpg around town, which is the same as my Subaru Legacy GT. Her old Toyota Echo got 50 % better mileage (600 klicks for 40 litres, versus 400).

So, after having read a few complaints about the Soul&#039;s mileage on other forums, it does seem true -- this thing is a gas hog for the performance it doesn&#039;t deliver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi:</p>
<p>My niece has had one of these for six months and quite likes it. Has the 2 litre and automatic.</p>
<p>However, she is only getting about 23 mpg around town, which is the same as my Subaru Legacy GT. Her old Toyota Echo got 50 % better mileage (600 klicks for 40 litres, versus 400).</p>
<p>So, after having read a few complaints about the Soul&#8217;s mileage on other forums, it does seem true &#8212; this thing is a gas hog for the performance it doesn&#8217;t deliver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

