2009 Ford Flex Review

2009 Ford Flex
2009 Ford Flex

It’s happened more than a few times – I’m chatting with a fellow gearhead about the latest sports cars, old muscle cars, or whatever I’m in the mood for at the time. Then, the inevitable question: “What kind of car do you drive?” I ask. “Well,” he says as he looks at his feet, “I used to have a [insert cool car here] but had to sell for a minivan when we had kids.” Ouch! This has been happening all over America for years, folks, and we have to put an end to it.

So what are we to do when car guys across the country are being forced to trade in their beloved hot rod for a big bloated, bland, and boring minivan or SUV? Well, Ford hopes they have the answer with the brand new Ford Flex.

Sitting somewhere between a minivan and SUV in class, the Flex finally gives my above mentioned friend something to haul the family around without being too embarrassed. You might even call it cool. It certainly looks like nothing else on the road, proven by the intrigued and/or disgusted looks we got while driving ours down the street.

Our review model: 2009 Ford Flex Limited AWD

So what did we think of the Flex for the week we had one?

2009 Ford Flex

We had a top-of-the line Flex, which included 19-inch wheels, xenon headlights, adjustable pedals, perforated leather seats, Sync, SatNav, rear back-up camera, and the signature white two-tone roof. Our model was also fitted with an AWD powertrain, which is available on the top two trim levels (SEL and Limited.) All Flexs come with a 3.5-liter V6 producing 262 horsepower, mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission, which is a good match for the Flex and provides plenty of power.

The first thing I noticed when climbing into the Flex was that it had lots of room, but didn’t feel humdrum like a minivan or SUV. It felt more like a vehicle that a small rock band would drive around and have enough room to carry all their equipment (but no room for the groupies.) A modern day VW bus, perhaps.

What We Liked

2009 Ford Flex interiorI didn’t like the Ford Flex for the first couple of days driving it, but after a while it started growing on me. It has all the typical modern Ford charms like the Sync (although I had some problems with it this time,) the ambient lighting, and comforts like adjustable pedals, automatic power liftgate, driver memory seats, a rear seat refrigerator, and vista moonroof with four total openings (one in front, two for middle row, and one for rear.) Ford has been good about their tech lately, and the Flex is no exception. In addition to regular comforts, the media options are adequate for anyone, providing Bluetooth, voice command, MP3 player integration (so far better than any other car maker,) a good navigation system, Sirius Travel Link, rear back-up camera, and a DVD entertainment system. Most of this isn’t standard, of course, but is available nonetheless. Another note worth mentioning is that the Flex has a total of four power outlets and a 110V power inverter, which provides plenty of flexibility while on the go.

What impressed me most about the Flex however, was the way it drove. Instead of feeling like you’re driving a giant box – which essentially defines the Flex – it feels more like a large sedan. No excessive body roll, good acceleration and braking, a good suspension, and good overall maneuverability without feeling top-heavy. Best of all, the Flex felt like it was quality built, which was a problem for Ford there for a while. Tight fit and finish all around, no excessively large panel gaps, and no “tin box” feeling inside or out.

Expect plenty of room for seven. The front and 2nd row seating has more than enough room for full-grown adults, but save the third row for the little ones or flexible teenagers.

What We Didn’t Like

2009 Ford Flex interior

There isn’t much about the Flex that they got wrong, unless you’re one of the folks who hate the boxy styling (or your friends telling you it looks like a hearse.) It can be rather expensive, starting at $28,550 for the base model (although a well-equipped base model.) Be careful adding options and packages, because it gets expensive fast. Our 2009 Ford Flex Limited AWD came in at around $42,000, which is either a decent price, or expensive, depending on what you’re comparing it with. Oh, and Ford – at $42,000, I expect a telescoping steering wheel, which the Flex doesn’t offer at all.

Before You Buy

A few things to keep in mind about the Ford Flex: While it has plenty of cargo room for most people (83 cubic feet,) it still doesn’t hold quite as much as minivans and some full-size crossovers. Make sure to note that on your test drive and be sure it will work for you.

Fuel Economy

MPG (city/hwy)

17/24 for the FWD models, 16/23 for AWD. Not great, but expect about the same from the other vehicles you’ll be looking at.

2009 Ford Flex side

Also check out…

Chevy Traverse
Mercedes GLK350
Audi Q5
Lexus RX350

There are plenty of crossovers in a similar price range and specification, but none have quite the looks or attitude as the Ford Flex. It will be a good choice for many families, as long as they don’t mind the boxy styling. One of the only vehicles on the road that you can compare with a minivan and still call cool.

We trust Edmunds.com to give us the best, up to date, and TRUE pricing of what people are really paying for their cars. Get a free dealer quote at Edmunds on this car:

Buy a New Car at Internet Pricing at Edmunds.com

About The Author

I founded Automoblog.net in May of 2006 to share my love of cars. My favorites include the Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 VT and Koenigsegg CCX, and I think the Ferrari 360 Spider is still one of the sexiest cars in existence. For “normal” cars, I like imports – Nissan, Audi, Subaru… I love my Pearl Yellow (don’t judge) 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT and plan to get it to around 550 HP one day. I’m also an avid world traveler and love rock climbing.

3 Comments on "2009 Ford Flex Review"

  1. I think these look cool as hell. I love the old-school looks that are cleaned-up and modernized. Interior quality is impressive as well. Only American-based company that can make a decent dash.

    Surprised to see how much you liked the drive. I've been reading that the driving experience is okay, but kind of on the "ho-hum".

    I have one question though: How did you do with the Sync? I've heard both sides. What'd you think of it?

  2. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't call driving it "fun" or engaging, but it was better than I expected it to be. As big as it was, I expected body roll and loose steering, but they did a good job avoiding that.

    As far as Sync goes, I really like the idea, and I think it can be great. Every Ford I've driven has been different though, so it's hard to say absolutely yes or no; it just depends on the Ford you're driving. The reason it's different is because each car will have different equipment, and since Sync is integrated into all of it, the experience will vary.

    When they get it right, it's a really great tool, and I couldn't recommend it more. Even when it gives me problems it's a better system than most vehicles provide. The biggest problem I've faced is the voice recognition and voice navigation.

  3. Tim

    I spent a weekend in one of these, and I wonder if I was driving the same vehicle as you. I can only think of one nice thing to say about it: the build quality was pretty good, for a Ford.

    And while I'm not typically the biggest fan of boxy cars, that's not actually what's terrible about the Flex. The outside is boxy but clean, while the inside is just … weird. For example, if you look down the ceiling of most cars, it's flat, or has a single bump for the dome light in the middle. The ceiling of this car looked like the rolling hills at the end of Gone With the Wind: always poking down in weird places for no apparent reason. The seats, the walls, the armrests — everything was just oddly lumpy. It's like it was designed for Quasimodo. There's no way to sit comfortably if you're not in the front.

    They claim it seats 7 people, but it really seats 4 people and 3 half-people. I'm not a terribly big guy (less than 6 foot), but I couldn't sit in the third row without angling my legs to one side and my feet apart. Good thing I'm not claustrophobic! Once the second row is seated, you can't move.

    The back gate was also a pain to open or close, and it had less cargo space than it looks like it ought to from the outside. Unlike any station wagon from the 70's or 80's or any minivan from the 90's or 2000's, this is a lousy road-trip vehicle.

    Also, the dashboard controls were stupidly complex. We had half a dozen engineers in the car and had trouble figuring out the climate controls, or how to turn off various interior lights. Sometimes temperature is a dial, sometimes it's some buttons, and sometimes it's some buttons that let you use other dials, with abbreviations on the labels that make no sense ("FOLD CAT"? huh?) … it's a complete mess.

    The thing has unimpressive gas mileage (as you can guess from the big engine), and lots of electronic gadgets. Every time you do something, even something as benign as opening a door when the car is parked, it beeps a little tune at you, which drove us crazy in short order. It's like they tried to substitute engine power and electronic doodads for design. I'd have gladly traded Bluetooth support for the ability to sit up straight.

    I can't think of a single reason to buy this instead of a minivan. You'd have to really love square cars and really hate your passengers.

Leave a Reply