<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mercedes F-CELL Roadster &#8211; Trainees Build A Car Of The Future</title> <atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/</link> <description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-75853</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/#comment-75853</guid> <description>Hmmmmmm interesting, I wonder what the point is, this thing has absolutely no justification at all. Those trainees should all get an F. Why would anyone want to go slower than a bicycle, with less fun, and while staying fat ? This is a joke. I got one of those :   &lt;span class=&quot;removed_link&quot; title=&quot;http://ice.hpv.co.uk/images/trikes/q/images/q_2008_b.jpg&quot;&gt;http://ice.hpv.co.uk/images/trikes/q/images/q_200...&lt;/span&gt; 70-80 km/h (downhill) on THAT feels amazing. On the joke above, the wheels are way too large and the weight is excessive, so you&#039;d probably end up in a tree... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmmm interesting, I wonder what the point is, this thing has absolutely no justification at all. Those trainees should all get an F.</p><p>Why would anyone want to go slower than a bicycle, with less fun, and while staying fat ? This is a joke.</p><p>I got one of those :<br /> <span class="removed_link" title="http://ice.hpv.co.uk/images/trikes/q/images/q_2008_b.jpg"><a href="http://ice.hpv.co.uk/images/trikes/q/images/q_200..." rel="nofollow">http://ice.hpv.co.uk/images/trikes/q/images/q_200&#8230;</a></span></p><p>70-80 km/h (downhill) on THAT feels amazing. On the joke above, the wheels are way too large and the weight is excessive, so you&#039;d probably end up in a tree&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-75814</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/03/25/mercedes-f-cell-roadster/#comment-75814</guid> <description>If it weren&#039;t for the press release and all, seeing this photo I could&#039;ve sworn this is a photoshopped joke. But if the top speed is only 25kph then maybe bicycle wheels should be comfy enough. But the chassis itself wouldn&#039;t look half bad with a set of 20&quot; rims (as opposed 67&quot; spokes!) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it weren&#039;t for the press release and all, seeing this photo I could&#039;ve sworn this is a photoshopped joke. But if the top speed is only 25kph then maybe bicycle wheels should be comfy enough. But the chassis itself wouldn&#039;t look half bad with a set of 20&quot; rims (as opposed 67&quot; spokes!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 384/388 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.automoblog.net

Served from: www.automoblog.net @ 2012-02-13 07:15:25 -->
