<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Gear USA To Build 70-mpg Car For $7K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/comment-page-1/#comment-131984</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/#comment-131984</guid>
		<description>Also, what the hell did they mean 70 MPG, surely not 70 MPG EPA #&#039;s they&#039;re loose in the head.  I to make a car that goes 0-60 in 7 seconds, and could achieve 70MPG in a fuel mileage competition, but not 70mpg with the new EPA standards.  Let them take me on and I&#039;ll build a car myself that will do that for a third their price. Oh BTW it would be a gas burner, not a diesel(contains more energy than gas per gallon). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, what the hell did they mean 70 MPG, surely not 70 MPG EPA #&#039;s they&#039;re loose in the head.  I to make a car that goes 0-60 in 7 seconds, and could achieve 70MPG in a fuel mileage competition, but not 70mpg with the new EPA standards.  Let them take me on and I&#039;ll build a car myself that will do that for a third their price. Oh BTW it would be a gas burner, not a diesel(contains more energy than gas per gallon). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/comment-page-1/#comment-131983</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/#comment-131983</guid>
		<description>Yes, the whole point is comedy, I mean who would watch Top Gear if it weren&#039;t funny.  If there were a TG USA they would first need writers, that had great humor.  Then gather us some people who could deliver the humor and finally find some cars to talk about and maybe a challenge, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the whole point is comedy, I mean who would watch Top Gear if it weren&#039;t funny.  If there were a TG USA they would first need writers, that had great humor.  Then gather us some people who could deliver the humor and finally find some cars to talk about and maybe a challenge, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/comment-page-1/#comment-73004</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/02/25/top-gear-usa-to-build-70-mpg-car-for-7k/#comment-73004</guid>
		<description>Please join my facebook group &quot;Please don&#039;t make an American Top Gear&quot; and help stop this madness... these guys just aren&#039;t funny... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please join my facebook group &quot;Please don&#039;t make an American Top Gear&quot; and help stop this madness&#8230; these guys just aren&#039;t funny&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

