<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VW BlueSport, 57 MPG Roadster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james braselton</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-77819</link>
		<dc:creator>james braselton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-77819</guid>
		<description>HI   THERE   YOU  ARE  RIGHT  ABOUT  VW   TDI   GETTING  60  MILES  PER  GALLON  I  HAVE  THE  VW  BEATEL   WITH  A  1.9   LITER   TDI  I  GET  ABOUT  60  MILES  PER  GALLON  AND  WITH  A  14.5  GALLON  TANK  I  CAN  GET  600  TOO  800  MILES   BEFORE  REFILE   WE  DRIVE  IT  A  LOT  WHEN  FUEL  PRICES  WENT  TOO  $5.00   PER  GALLON </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI   THERE   YOU  ARE  RIGHT  ABOUT  VW   TDI   GETTING  60  MILES  PER  GALLON  I  HAVE  THE  VW  BEATEL   WITH  A  1.9   LITER   TDI  I  GET  ABOUT  60  MILES  PER  GALLON  AND  WITH  A  14.5  GALLON  TANK  I  CAN  GET  600  TOO  800  MILES   BEFORE  REFILE   WE  DRIVE  IT  A  LOT  WHEN  FUEL  PRICES  WENT  TOO  $5.00   PER  GALLON </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68545</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to come up with a killer response, but I&#039;m pulling a blank here. I guess an opinion is an opinion, and words really can&#039;t change that. 
 
I personally think the Sky is the best looking car under 30 grand. Hell, you would have to go quite a ways up the price spectrum until I spot a car that I think looks better. The curves, the side vents, the reverse-hinged hood....I just never get tired of looking at it. But it&#039;s not everybody&#039;s groove, though they are always surprised to see that it&#039;s a Saturn. 
 
Oh no Tony! You too? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m trying to come up with a killer response, but I&#039;m pulling a blank here. I guess an opinion is an opinion, and words really can&#039;t change that.</p>
<p>I personally think the Sky is the best looking car under 30 grand. Hell, you would have to go quite a ways up the price spectrum until I spot a car that I think looks better. The curves, the side vents, the reverse-hinged hood&#8230;.I just never get tired of looking at it. But it&#039;s not everybody&#039;s groove, though they are always surprised to see that it&#039;s a Saturn.</p>
<p>Oh no Tony! You too? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68523</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68523</guid>
		<description>the overly-busy Sky. 
 
I agree with you. 
 
I have a friend who is a hto rod design, and as he would say &quot;Too many hicoughs.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the overly-busy Sky.</p>
<p>I agree with you.</p>
<p>I have a friend who is a hto rod design, and as he would say &quot;Too many hicoughs.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Borgia</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68516</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Borgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68516</guid>
		<description>I am going to catch some flak for this, but here it goes: I think the Sky is ugly. There I said it! 
 
Honestly, it isn&#039;t all that good-looking to me. It looks like some angry bug in the front, and the rear taillights look cheap and tacky. I think the car itself is great, and that turbo engine is outstanding (fooled around in a Solstice GXP a few months ago), but I think the dopey look of the Solstice is better looking than the overly-busy Sky. 
 
I guess Will is my latest dissident now..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to catch some flak for this, but here it goes: I think the Sky is ugly. There I said it!</p>
<p>Honestly, it isn&#039;t all that good-looking to me. It looks like some angry bug in the front, and the rear taillights look cheap and tacky. I think the car itself is great, and that turbo engine is outstanding (fooled around in a Solstice GXP a few months ago), but I think the dopey look of the Solstice is better looking than the overly-busy Sky.</p>
<p>I guess Will is my latest dissident now&#8230;.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68464</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68464</guid>
		<description>Whoa! 
 
Better looking than the Sky, Nicholas? Better looking than my baby? Well, we&#039;ll just see about that when my 260 horses power to 60 mph in 5 seconds, but I&#039;ll be sure to wave at you as I pass by.... 
 
Just kidding. Ownership pride aside, I&#039;m glad VW did this, and I hope they make it. The 57 miles to the gallon is great as well. And is it just me or does the front look like the VW Scirocco? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa!</p>
<p>Better looking than the Sky, Nicholas? Better looking than my baby? Well, we&#039;ll just see about that when my 260 horses power to 60 mph in 5 seconds, but I&#039;ll be sure to wave at you as I pass by&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just kidding. Ownership pride aside, I&#039;m glad VW did this, and I hope they make it. The 57 miles to the gallon is great as well. And is it just me or does the front look like the VW Scirocco? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68381</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68381</guid>
		<description>Partly refining capacity, due to increasing demand in other parts in the world (especially China,) and partly because of the US transition to low sulfur diesel. Plus, the tax on diesel is a few cents more per gallon than gasoline. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partly refining capacity, due to increasing demand in other parts in the world (especially China,) and partly because of the US transition to low sulfur diesel. Plus, the tax on diesel is a few cents more per gallon than gasoline. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68377</guid>
		<description>Assuming of course that the price of diesel doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t stay a steady $1/gallon above regular petrol. 
 
And why the hell is that? 
 
No one has ever explained it .. is it lack of diesel refining capacity? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming of course that the price of diesel doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t stay a steady $1/gallon above regular petrol.</p>
<p>And why the hell is that?</p>
<p>No one has ever explained it .. is it lack of diesel refining capacity? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68376</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68376</guid>
		<description>Better looking than the Sky? I don&#039;t know about that, but it&#039;s definitely better than the other small roadsters on the market right now. The fact that it&#039;s a diesel is great as well, and will hopefully start a trend. Assuming of course that the price of diesel doesn&#039;t stay a steady $1/gallon above regular petrol. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better looking than the Sky? I don&#039;t know about that, but it&#039;s definitely better than the other small roadsters on the market right now. The fact that it&#039;s a diesel is great as well, and will hopefully start a trend. Assuming of course that the price of diesel doesn&#039;t stay a steady $1/gallon above regular petrol. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Borgia</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68368</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Borgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68368</guid>
		<description>I like it as well! Much better looking than either the MX-5 or Solstice/Sky. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it as well! Much better looking than either the MX-5 or Solstice/Sky. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68356</guid>
		<description>If they could bring that to market in the mid-20s, that could be the green version of the Miata. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they could bring that to market in the mid-20s, that could be the green version of the Miata. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/comment-page-1/#comment-68353</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2009/01/13/vw-bluesport-57-mpg-roadster/#comment-68353</guid>
		<description>Wow, it&#039;s...really attractive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#039;s&#8230;really attractive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

