<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Why Chrysler&#8217;s New $2.99/gallon of Gas Promo Is Merely So-So</title> <atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/22/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/22/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/</link> <description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/22/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/comment-page-1/#comment-67409</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/20/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/#comment-67409</guid> <description>Funny now that gas is under $2/gallon again. It&#039;ll go back up, of course, but I bet the suckers who fell for that promo are pissed. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny now that gas is under $2/gallon again. It&#039;ll go back up, of course, but I bet the suckers who fell for that promo are pissed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/22/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/comment-page-1/#comment-40199</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:35:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/20/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/#comment-40199</guid> <description>Good point Llama money. Maybe Dodge wouldn&#039;t have as much of an issue, but the Chrysler line - I couldn&#039;t see that fairing well for them unless they really started to turn around; much like Hyundai has recently.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Llama money. Maybe Dodge wouldn&#8217;t have as much of an issue, but the Chrysler line &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t see that fairing well for them unless they really started to turn around; much like Hyundai has recently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Llama Money</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/22/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/comment-page-1/#comment-40179</link> <dc:creator>Llama Money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/20/why-chryslers-new-299gallon-of-gas-promo-is-merely-so-so/#comment-40179</guid> <description>Nobody&#039;s buying the conventionaly Sebring - why would they buy a more expensive hybrid version?Chrysler&#039;s problems run far, far deeper than lack of hybrids.  They need to get regular cars right before they even *think* about anything as advanced as hybrids.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody&#8217;s buying the conventionaly Sebring &#8211; why would they buy a more expensive hybrid version?</p><p>Chrysler&#8217;s problems run far, far deeper than lack of hybrids.  They need to get regular cars right before they even *think* about anything as advanced as hybrids.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 401/405 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.automoblog.net

Served from: www.automoblog.net @ 2012-02-13 12:14:57 -->
