<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would You Buy a Tata Nano?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-73749</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/#comment-73749</guid>
		<description>A $2500 car would be good for just about anyone. Cheap.. Spend my money on better home good and less on my car. A car is only a source of transportation and when cars first came out they sold cheap new and did not have luxury items we see today. Only a fool would turn a $3000 into a $15,000 car with speakers, stereo, amps, lights system, ect.. But I think other companies are smart to follow the pattern of a cheap car verses all expensive cars. Me? I have a new Chevy Pickup but am on a fixed income, the loan is ready to break me, and I think this is a solution to some problems. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $2500 car would be good for just about anyone. Cheap.. Spend my money on better home good and less on my car. A car is only a source of transportation and when cars first came out they sold cheap new and did not have luxury items we see today. Only a fool would turn a $3000 into a $15,000 car with speakers, stereo, amps, lights system, ect.. But I think other companies are smart to follow the pattern of a cheap car verses all expensive cars. Me? I have a new Chevy Pickup but am on a fixed income, the loan is ready to break me, and I think this is a solution to some problems. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-40120</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/#comment-40120</guid>
		<description>You know what it reminds me of? The Peel P50. Top Gear did a hilarious review on it: &lt;span class=&quot;removed_link&quot; title=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mio5fTKqWgM&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mio5fTKqWgM&lt;/span&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what it reminds me of? The Peel P50. Top Gear did a hilarious review on it: <span class="removed_link" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mio5fTKqWgM"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mio5fTKqWgM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mio5fTKqWgM</a></span> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Borgia</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-40112</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Borgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/#comment-40112</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see it working on a larger scale. People think that a car with only four speakers and a single CD slot is the interm level in a car. Or that a car without automatic climate control is to pedestrian. People are too confused about what they want and what they really need. You don&#039;t need a Bose/harmon kardon/Levinson audio system in your $15000 car simply because you want it.  
 
However, I do see this car working for the lower income bracket. Something like this is perfect for them: They get reliable transportation (hopefully) at an incredibly affordable price. The ability to dump some rust bucket gas guzzler for an efficient sedan with a warranty sounds like it would be a good idea for a lot of people. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t see it working on a larger scale. People think that a car with only four speakers and a single CD slot is the interm level in a car. Or that a car without automatic climate control is to pedestrian. People are too confused about what they want and what they really need. You don&#039;t need a Bose/harmon kardon/Levinson audio system in your $15000 car simply because you want it. </p>
<p>However, I do see this car working for the lower income bracket. Something like this is perfect for them: They get reliable transportation (hopefully) at an incredibly affordable price. The ability to dump some rust bucket gas guzzler for an efficient sedan with a warranty sounds like it would be a good idea for a lot of people. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-40033</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/05/21/tata-nano/#comment-40033</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see it being far off. I don&#039;t think people are willing to give up the cars they love, but for an every day commute car, I&#039;d buy one. Of course I&#039;d keep my fun cars - that&#039;s part of who I am. And I&#039;d keep any utility cars out of necessity, but if the Nano came to the states for $2,000 or even $3,000 I&#039;d buy it to drive to work and back every day, maybe some longer travel. Even if the interior does look like it was carved from clay. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t see it being far off. I don&#039;t think people are willing to give up the cars they love, but for an every day commute car, I&#039;d buy one. Of course I&#039;d keep my fun cars &#8211; that&#039;s part of who I am. And I&#039;d keep any utility cars out of necessity, but if the Nano came to the states for $2,000 or even $3,000 I&#039;d buy it to drive to work and back every day, maybe some longer travel. Even if the interior does look like it was carved from clay. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

