<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mitsubishi v. Mazda v. Toyota: A Sport Compact Shoot-out</title> <atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/</link> <description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Nick Borgia</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/comment-page-1/#comment-40578</link> <dc:creator>Nick Borgia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/#comment-40578</guid> <description>To my brother and I, an ingauging driving experience is much more important than technology. The Mitsu was much better than the last generation, but it still can&#039;t compete with the fun-to-drive feeling you get behind the wheel of the 3. I don&#039;t want to repeat myself here as I&#039;ve explained it in the article. On looks, I think the Lancer is much more aggressive looking, but the back end has those squinty taillights. Not very attractive. The 3 has that sleek, Euro look to it and it looks good from both the front and the rear. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my brother and I, an ingauging driving experience is much more important than technology. The Mitsu was much better than the last generation, but it still can&#039;t compete with the fun-to-drive feeling you get behind the wheel of the 3. I don&#039;t want to repeat myself here as I&#039;ve explained it in the article.</p><p>On looks, I think the Lancer is much more aggressive looking, but the back end has those squinty taillights. Not very attractive. The 3 has that sleek, Euro look to it and it looks good from both the front and the rear.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Demonblade</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/comment-page-1/#comment-40564</link> <dc:creator>Demonblade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/#comment-40564</guid> <description>Not a bad choice, but a very plain, common one. I myself would have chosen the Lancer, simply because it has the best tech and looks the best out of the three. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad choice, but a very plain, common one. I myself would have chosen the Lancer, simply because it has the best tech and looks the best out of the three.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 384/388 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.automoblog.net

Served from: www.automoblog.net @ 2012-02-13 11:45:29 -->
