<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitsubishi v. Mazda v. Toyota: A Sport Compact Shoot-out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Borgia</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/comment-page-1/#comment-40578</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Borgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/#comment-40578</guid>
		<description>To my brother and I, an ingauging driving experience is much more important than technology. The Mitsu was much better than the last generation, but it still can&#039;t compete with the fun-to-drive feeling you get behind the wheel of the 3. I don&#039;t want to repeat myself here as I&#039;ve explained it in the article. 
 
On looks, I think the Lancer is much more aggressive looking, but the back end has those squinty taillights. Not very attractive. The 3 has that sleek, Euro look to it and it looks good from both the front and the rear. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my brother and I, an ingauging driving experience is much more important than technology. The Mitsu was much better than the last generation, but it still can&#039;t compete with the fun-to-drive feeling you get behind the wheel of the 3. I don&#039;t want to repeat myself here as I&#039;ve explained it in the article.</p>
<p>On looks, I think the Lancer is much more aggressive looking, but the back end has those squinty taillights. Not very attractive. The 3 has that sleek, Euro look to it and it looks good from both the front and the rear. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demonblade</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/comment-page-1/#comment-40564</link>
		<dc:creator>Demonblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2008/04/18/mazda3-toyota-corolla-xrs-mitsubishi-lancer-gts/#comment-40564</guid>
		<description>Not a bad choice, but a very plain, common one. I myself would have chosen the Lancer, simply because it has the best tech and looks the best out of the three. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad choice, but a very plain, common one. I myself would have chosen the Lancer, simply because it has the best tech and looks the best out of the three. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

