<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kia Ex_Cee\&#8217;d Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/</link>
	<description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken R</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 01:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>Many folk knock Kia because of its relatively low prices (snobbery if ever there was) BUT you forget one very important factor which seems never to feature in any car review. I&#039;ve owned three Kia cars now (two at present) and my experience is that they are every bit as reliable as Toyota. They don&#039;t rust, they don&#039;t break down, they do a very impressive fuel economy, are cheap to insure and they go on forever. Apart from dealer services (inexpensive) the only attention mine ever get or need is occasional fuel and occasional water in the windscreen washer bottle. That&#039;s it. Superb value for money motoring. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many folk knock Kia because of its relatively low prices (snobbery if ever there was) BUT you forget one very important factor which seems never to feature in any car review. I&#039;ve owned three Kia cars now (two at present) and my experience is that they are every bit as reliable as Toyota. They don&#039;t rust, they don&#039;t break down, they do a very impressive fuel economy, are cheap to insure and they go on forever. Apart from dealer services (inexpensive) the only attention mine ever get or need is occasional fuel and occasional water in the windscreen washer bottle. That&#039;s it. Superb value for money motoring. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Karesh</title>
		<link>http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-4935</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2007/03/16/kia-ex_cee%e2%80%99d-concept/#comment-4935</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be too quick to discount Kia. They don&#039;t produce anything for the enthusiast to get excited about, at least not yet, but they put together some of the best interiors you&#039;ll find in an affordable car.

My comments on this, based partly on the press days in Chicago:
http://www.truedelta.com/blog/?p=42</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too quick to discount Kia. They don&#8217;t produce anything for the enthusiast to get excited about, at least not yet, but they put together some of the best interiors you&#8217;ll find in an affordable car.</p>
<p>My comments on this, based partly on the press days in Chicago:<br />
<a href="http://www.truedelta.com/blog/?p=42" rel="nofollow">http://www.truedelta.com/blog/?p=42</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

