<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Jaguar XJ220 Pininfarina</title> <atom:link href="http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/</link> <description>A Car Blog for Auto Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Jaguar XJ220 &#124; neerajjangid.com</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-138148</link> <dc:creator>Jaguar XJ220 &#124; neerajjangid.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:02:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-138148</guid> <description>[...] V6? 217 mph in 1992? That’s some seriously impressive engineering. Be sure to check out the Pininfarina version as [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] V6? 217 mph in 1992? That’s some seriously impressive engineering. Be sure to check out the Pininfarina version as [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tires</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-133455</link> <dc:creator>Tires</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-133455</guid> <description>I agree on popup headlights. They do look aweful and when they stop working it is a nightmare. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on popup headlights. They do look aweful and when they stop working it is a nightmare.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ian</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-131917</link> <dc:creator>ian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:29:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-131917</guid> <description>As a life long Jaguar afficianado I have to say, this is by far the ugliest thing I have ever seen with a Jaguar badge on it. It is not as good looking as the origianal &amp; nowhere near as eyecatching as the TWR xj220. Sir William Lyons probably rolled over in his grave the 1st time that car was seen in public. Twice. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a life long Jaguar afficianado I have to say, this is by far the ugliest thing I have ever seen with a Jaguar badge on it. It is not as good looking as the origianal &amp; nowhere near as eyecatching as the TWR xj220. Sir William Lyons probably rolled over in his grave the 1st time that car was seen in public. Twice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-51130</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-51130</guid> <description>I agree that the redesigned NSX headlights look bad, and I prefer the pop-up headlights on that. However, that&#039;s the only car that I can think of where that applies. I love the Diablo (300ZX) headlights, and frankly don&#039;t even enjoy the looks of the Diablo before that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the redesigned NSX headlights look bad, and I prefer the pop-up headlights on that. However, that&#039;s the only car that I can think of where that applies. I love the Diablo (300ZX) headlights, and frankly don&#039;t even enjoy the looks of the Diablo before that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pop-up Popye</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-51120</link> <dc:creator>Pop-up Popye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-51120</guid> <description>&quot;On a side note, I think all pop-up headlights should be abolished and replaced with the fixed beams. They look terrible when deployed, and destroy and good looks the car may have had when they were down, not to mention kill the aerodynamics.&quot; Tsk Tsk, Chris... Hidden headlights keep the car&#039;s design pure. Everyone knows that.  Take a look at the original NSX (as you mentioned) and compare it to the later goofy, fixed-light version. Or take the Diablo. Wow, what a mess they made with that 300ZX-overstock headlight redesign. The Jag looks beautiful.. Its just unfortunate they put those JDM 180SX ebay headlights on it. Other than the stock (Pontiac hubcap?) wheels, it gets my thumbs up for sexy supercar. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;On a side note, I think all pop-up headlights should be abolished and replaced with the fixed beams. They look terrible when deployed, and destroy and good looks the car may have had when they were down, not to mention kill the aerodynamics.&quot;</p><p>Tsk Tsk, Chris&#8230; Hidden headlights keep the car&#039;s design pure. Everyone knows that.  Take a look at the original NSX (as you mentioned) and compare it to the later goofy, fixed-light version. Or take the Diablo. Wow, what a mess they made with that 300ZX-overstock headlight redesign.</p><p>The Jag looks beautiful.. Its just unfortunate they put those JDM 180SX ebay headlights on it. Other than the stock (Pontiac hubcap?) wheels, it gets my thumbs up for sexy supercar.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Top 10 Fastest Cars in the World &#171; AutomoBlog.net</title><link>http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/comment-page-1/#comment-9979</link> <dc:creator>Top 10 Fastest Cars in the World &#171; AutomoBlog.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:39:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automoblog.net/2006/10/09/jaguar-xj220-pininfarina/#comment-9979</guid> <description>[...] Even older than the McLaren F1, the Jaguar XJ220 has been on this list since 1992. Be sure to check out the Pininfarina version as well. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even older than the McLaren F1, the Jaguar XJ220 has been on this list since 1992. Be sure to check out the Pininfarina version as well. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 452/456 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.automoblog.net

Served from: www.automoblog.net @ 2012-02-13 07:14:30 -->
